I saw this over at the Google open source blog:
50% improvement in compile time for the Linux kernel seems like a very
significant improvement. What percentage of the C++ community will
find this useful?
-
I saw this over at the Google open source blog:
50% improvement in compile time for the Linux kernel seems like a very
significant improvement. What percentage of the C++ community will
find this useful?
-
Re: Distributed C++ compilation
Dilip wrote:How is this C++ specific? If it isn't, don't ask "the C++ community",I saw this over at the Google open source blog:
>
50% improvement in compile time for the Linux kernel seems like a very
significant improvement. What percentage of the C++ community will
find this useful?
ask the programming community at large, in 'comp.programmi ng'.
Making things faster is a never-ending job. The sole purpose of making
computers is to compute things faster... Does C++ have any future?
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
-
Re: Distributed C++ compilation
Dilip wrote:It looks rather old hat. I've been tweaking distributed build farms forI saw this over at the Google open source blog:
>
50% improvement in compile time for the Linux kernel seems like a very
significant improvement. What percentage of the C++ community will
find this useful?
over a decade.
--
Ian Collins.
Comment
-
Re: Distributed C++ compilation
Dilip wrote:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.co...esign-for.html>
I saw this over at the Google open source blog:
>It's not 50% improvement in compile time, but in "build speed". Otherwise,>
50% improvement in compile time for the Linux kernel seems like a very
significant improvement.
the 200% improvement with Samba would be rather impressing (being finished
before it even started).
Considering that I don't have that many servers to push compile jobs to...What percentage of the C++ community will find this useful?
Comment
Comment