pointer variable vs reference variables

[sulekhasweety@gmail.com]

dear all,


can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
reference variables ?

[santosh]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

sulekhasweety@g mail.com wrote:

dear all,
>
>
can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
reference variables ?

You'll have to ask in a C++ group (comp.lang.c++) or in a group
appropriate to whatever language you are using (presumably it contains
both pointers and references, hence your question). C has no
references. If you want language independent responses, then
comp.programmin g might be a better place to post this question.

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D3_h=C9ilidhe?=]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

On Jun 7, 8:25 am, sulekhaswe...@g mail.com wrote:

dear all,
>
can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
reference variables ?

References don't exist in C, they're a C++ thing. A reference is
simply a pointer with the following features:
* You don't have to dereference it, it gets dereferenced
automagically
* You can't change what it points to

So the following two are equivalent:

void Func(int const *p) { *p = 5; }

void Func(int &i) { p = 5; }

If you want references in C, then you can play around with macroes:

void Func(int const *p)
{
# define i (*p)

i = 5;
}

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D3_h=C9ilidhe?=]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

    void Func(int &i) { p = 5; }

i = 5;

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tom=E1s_=D3_h=C9ilidhe?=]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

On Jun 7, 9:05 am, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <t...@lavabit.c omwrote:

    void Func(int const *p) { *p = 5; }

int *const p

    void Func(int const *p)

int *const p

I should go back to bed.

[Malcolm McLean]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables


<sulekhasweety@ gmail.comwrote in message news:

dear all,
>
>
can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
reference variables ?
>

References exist in Java and C++, and are basically syntactic sugar for
pointers. They point only to one object, and may never be null. However the
variable is passed as an address, ie a pointer.

--
Free games and programming goodies.

http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm

[nembo kid]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

sulekhasweety@g mail.com ha scritto:

can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
reference variables ?

It is useless since "reference variables" is not C.

[rahul]

Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

On Jun 7, 2:19 pm, "Malcolm McLean" <regniz...@btin ternet.comwrote :

References exist in Java and C++, and are basically syntactic sugar for

pointers. They point only to one object, and may never be null.

A bit off the topic, but references can be null in Java. References in
Java work
like constant pointers in C.

[Eric Sosman]

[OT] Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

Malcolm McLean wrote:

>
<sulekhasweety@ gmail.comwrote in message news:

>dear all,
>>
>>
>can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
>reference variables ?
>>

References exist in Java and C++, and are basically syntactic sugar for
pointers. They point only to one object, and may never be null. However
the variable is passed as an address, ie a pointer.

<off-topic>

Dunno about C++, but what you say about Java is wrong on
all three points (or at least on two and a half points, allowing
some wiggle room in interpreting "they" in the second point):

1) A Java "reference" *is* what C calls a "pointer," not a
pointer hiding behind a sugar-coated facade. (Java gives
the programmer little freedom to manipulate its pointers,
but they're indisputably pointers. Note what's thrown for
misuse of a null reference: NullPointerExce ption.)

2) A Java reference value refers to only one object, just as
a C pointer value refers to only one object. A Java
reference variable, just like a C pointer variable, can
refer to different objects at different times.

3) A Java reference value or variable can be null.

</off-topic>

--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid

[Malcolm McLean]

Re: [OT] Re: pointer variable vs reference variables

"Eric Sosman" <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalidwrot e in message

Malcolm McLean wrote:

>>
><sulekhasweety @gmail.comwrote in message news:

>>dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>can anyone explain the differences between pointer variable and
>>reference variables ?
>>>

>References exist in Java and C++, and are basically syntactic sugar for
>pointers. They point only to one object, and may never be null. However
>the variable is passed as an address, ie a pointer.

>
<off-topic>
>
Dunno about C++, but what you say about Java is wrong on
all three points (or at least on two and a half points, allowing
some wiggle room in interpreting "they" in the second point):
>
1) A Java "reference" *is* what C calls a "pointer," not a
pointer hiding behind a sugar-coated facade. (Java gives
the programmer little freedom to manipulate its pointers,
but they're indisputably pointers. Note what's thrown for
misuse of a null reference: NullPointerExce ption.)
>
2) A Java reference value refers to only one object, just as
a C pointer value refers to only one object. A Java
reference variable, just like a C pointer variable, can
refer to different objects at different times.
>
3) A Java reference value or variable can be null.
>
</off-topic>
>

Java references can be null, fair point. The rest of this post is singularly
useless and unhelpful. Do you appreciate why?

--
Free games and programming goodies.

http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm