In article <k2mu34tkv26f6c 8h0qn3o0jksr1mo d4rcm@4ax.com>,
Jack Klein <jackklein@spam cop.netwrote:
What's unportable about it? It will cause the compilation to
fail if the types are unavailable or are implemented wrongly,
which is presumably the idea.
-- Richard
--
In the selection of the two characters immediately succeeding the numeral 9,
consideration shall be given to their replacement by the graphics 10 and 11 to
facilitate the adoption of the code in the sterling monetary area. (X3.4-1963)
Jack Klein <jackklein@spam cop.netwrote:
>I came across this method of checking the sizes:
>This is a pretty stupid idea, and extremely non-portable. Who's
>not-so-bright idea is it?
>not-so-bright idea is it?
fail if the types are unavailable or are implemented wrongly,
which is presumably the idea.
-- Richard
--
In the selection of the two characters immediately succeeding the numeral 9,
consideration shall be given to their replacement by the graphics 10 and 11 to
facilitate the adoption of the code in the sterling monetary area. (X3.4-1963)