Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • CBFalconer
    #1

    Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

    Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
    santosh <santosh.k83@gm ail.comwrites:
    >
    .... snip ...
    >
    >Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
    >It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
    >
    Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
    than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
    the other people?
    FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.

    --
    [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
    [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
    Try the download section.

    ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
    Tags: None
    • Joachim Schmitz
      #2
      Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

      CBFalconer wrote:
      Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
      >santosh <santosh.k83@gm ail.comwrites:
      >>
      ... snip ...
      >>
      >>Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
      >>It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
      >>
      >Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
      >than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
      >the other people?
      >
      FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.
      Replys to spam never are.


        Comment

        • Eligiusz Narutowicz
          #3
          Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

          "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@sc hmitz-digital.dewrite s:
          CBFalconer wrote:
          >Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
          >>santosh <santosh.k83@gm ail.comwrites:
          >>>
          >... snip ...
          >>>
          >>>Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
          >>>It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
          >>>
          >>Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
          >>than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
          >>the other people?
          >>
          >FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.
          Replys to spam never are.
          I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same person I
          think? All they seem to do is to telling people off for what they are
          seeing as topic issues.

            Comment

            • Joachim Schmitz
              #4
              Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

              Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
              "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@sc hmitz-digital.dewrite s:
              <snip>
              I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
              person I think?
              I don't believe that.

              Bye, Jojo


                Comment

                • CBFalconer
                  #5
                  Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

                  Joachim Schmitz wrote:
                  Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
                  >
                  <snip>
                  >
                  >I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
                  >person I think?
                  >
                  I don't believe that.
                  Nor do I :-)

                  --
                  [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
                  [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
                  Try the download section.


                  ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

                    Comment

                    • Richard Heathfield
                      #6
                      Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

                      Joachim Schmitz said:
                      Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
                      >"Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@sc hmitz-digital.dewrite s:
                      <snip>
                      >I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
                      >person I think?
                      I don't believe that.
                      Neither do I - but I'm not surprised that Mr Narutowicz believes it. Some
                      people have seriously difficulty in accepting that more than one person
                      might disagree with them, which is why these ludicrous allegations of
                      sockpuppetry crop up from time to time.

                      The difference in writing style between Santosh (or rather, "santosh", for
                      he invariably eschews the capital) and CBFalconer is significant, and each
                      is internally very consistent. If this is one person posting under both
                      nicks, he's either extremely clever, patient, and careful or very, very
                      unwell indeed. The simplest explanation consistent with the facts is that
                      the two identities genuinely belong to different people.

                      --
                      Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk >
                      Email: -http://www. +rjh@
                      Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
                      "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...