Eric Sosman wrote:
Well, if we all provided solutions for the ambiguous errata of K&R2 and
posted them here and sending them to K&R errata site, and/or perhaps
added to clc FAQ, I think would be useful to all.
Myself am going to post here and send to that K&R errata site all the
solutions I implemented for the ambiguous errata I have solved or others
contributed solutions, with their names, when finished.
The current solution I propose for this ambiguous errata is the addition
of a sentence:
"There is a distinction between storage duration and scope, though both
are influenced by explicit and implicit storage-class specifiers", right
after the sentence of A4.1, "Several keywords, together with the context
of an object's declaration, specify its storage class".
What does everyone think of this?
>
>
"Solution?" Are you asking us to rewrite K&R, or what?
>"195(§A4.1) The first few sentences might be reworded a bit to emphasize
>that there is a distinction between storage duration and scope, though
>both are influenced by explicit and implicit storage-class specifiers".
>>
>Can anyone provide a solution for this?
>that there is a distinction between storage duration and scope, though
>both are influenced by explicit and implicit storage-class specifiers".
>>
>Can anyone provide a solution for this?
"Solution?" Are you asking us to rewrite K&R, or what?
Well, if we all provided solutions for the ambiguous errata of K&R2 and
posted them here and sending them to K&R errata site, and/or perhaps
added to clc FAQ, I think would be useful to all.
Myself am going to post here and send to that K&R errata site all the
solutions I implemented for the ambiguous errata I have solved or others
contributed solutions, with their names, when finished.
The current solution I propose for this ambiguous errata is the addition
of a sentence:
"There is a distinction between storage duration and scope, though both
are influenced by explicit and implicit storage-class specifiers", right
after the sentence of A4.1, "Several keywords, together with the context
of an object's declaration, specify its storage class".
What does everyone think of this?