pointer vs non-pointer

[Carmen Sei]

to delcare an object with pointer -
MyCar * mycar = new MyCar;
mycar->Create();

=============== =========
to delcare an object without pointer -
MyCar mycar = new MyCar;
mycar.Create();

=============== =========
for pointer we use ->
for non-pointer we use . (dot)

=============== =========
I think for Java equivalent the -is same as Java's . (dot)

=============== =========
should I always you the MyCar * mycar = new MyCar; to initalize a new
Object?

since using -is same as using (dot) in Java.

=============== =========
when are the time to use the (dot) but not -(non-pointer) then?

[Fred Zwarts]

Re: pointer vs non-pointer

"Carmen Sei" <fatwallet951@y ahoo.comwrote in message news:qn0ft3tpem bv7h50octvok1o1 5nmtqkcbb@4ax.c om...

to delcare an object with pointer -
MyCar * mycar = new MyCar;
mycar->Create();

Why is this? Does the constructor of MyCar fail to create mycar?

=============== =========
to delcare an object without pointer -
MyCar mycar = new MyCar;

Did you try to compile this? It won't work.
The types are different at both sides of the =.
Left the type is MyCar (object), right the type is MyCar* (pointer to object).
Maybe you meant:

MyCar mycar;

mycar.Create();

=============== =========
for pointer we use ->
for non-pointer we use . (dot)

=============== =========
I think for Java equivalent the -is same as Java's . (dot)

In Java (almost) everything is a pointer, so only one operator is needed.
In C++ there are objects and pointers to objects,
so two operators are used for two different cases.
"mycar->" is equivalent to "(*mycar)." .

=============== =========
should I always you the MyCar * mycar = new MyCar; to initalize a new
Object?

No, only for dynamically created objects. For other objects use MyCar mycar;.

since using -is same as using (dot) in Java.

Approximately.
And Java has no equivalent for the C++ . (dot) operator.

=============== =========
when are the time to use the (dot) but not -(non-pointer) then?

When you have an variable that is not a pointer,
which may happen in fact more often than having a pointer.

Note further that, in contrast to Java, C++ has no automatic garbage cleaner
for dynamically created objects. Objects created with "new" need an explicit
"delete" to free their resources, otherwise a memory leak will be the result.
This is another reason to avoid the use of new, where possible.