Return value of main

[polas]

Good afternoon all,

I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else? In addition, if there has been some
failure, do people tend to return another value (such as -1?)

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

Cheers,
Nick

[Richard Bos]

Re: Return value of main

polas <nick@helpforce .comwrote:

I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else?

The Standard requires three values to return a definite status to the
environment: 0 and EXIT_SUCCESS signal success, EXIT_FAILURE signals
failure. EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE are macros #defined in
<stdlib.h>; what their actual values are is not defined by the Standard,
and may vary from implementation to implementation. Of course it is
highly common for EXIT_SUCCESS to be 0, and EXIT_FAILURE is often 1, but
neither of those is guaranteed.
If you return any other value from main() (or through exit()), this does
not make the program exhibit undefined behaviour; the only result is
that the meaning of the status returned to the environment is undefined
by the Standard. So calling exit(2) does not make your program print
weird things or write over memory it doesn't own; but it does mean that
the C Standard itself does not guarantee that other programs will see
this as your program having succeeded, failed, or otherwise.

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?

That depends entirely on the OS.

For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

It does; hence the existence of EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE, which can
be adapted to the OS' needs.

Richard

[Morris Dovey]

Re: Return value of main

polas wrote:

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

If you include <stdlib.h>, the symbols EXIT_SUCCESS and
EXIT_FAILURE will be defined appropriately.

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA

http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

[polas]

Re: Return value of main

On 10 Mar, 12:40, Morris Dovey <mrdo...@iedu.c omwrote:

polas wrote:

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

>
If you include <stdlib.h>, the symbols EXIT_SUCCESS and
EXIT_FAILURE will be defined appropriately.
>
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USAhttp://www.iedu.com/DeSoto

Thanks for the replies - that clears it up completely for me.

Nick

[santosh]

Re: Return value of main

polas wrote:

Good afternoon all,
>
I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else? In addition, if there has been some
failure, do people tend to return another value (such as -1?)

The only standard values for these are 0, EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE.
Zero is the same as EXIT_SUCCESS. For using any other values (like
1, -1 etc.) you'll have to seek the guarantees of standards beyond ISO
C.

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

No such standard behaviour is specified by ISO C. Each system might have
it's own standardised or semi-standard behaviour. The portability of C
code in your example will not be affected because a return of zero
always means successful termination and the C library is obliged to
translate this to whatever code that the system uses for successful
termination. Thus if for the underlying system 10 indicates successful
termination and you return zero, the C library will actually return 10.
It will do the same for a return of EXIT_SUCCESS too. A recompile for
each platform will ensure correct behaviour.

[polas]

Re: Return value of main

On 10 Mar, 13:52, santosh <santosh....@gm ail.comwrote:

polas wrote:

Good afternoon all,

>

I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else? In addition, if there has been some
failure, do people tend to return another value (such as -1?)

>
The only standard values for these are 0, EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE.
Zero is the same as EXIT_SUCCESS. For using any other values (like
1, -1 etc.) you'll have to seek the guarantees of standards beyond ISO
C.
>

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

>
No such standard behaviour is specified by ISO C. Each system might have
it's own standardised or semi-standard behaviour. The portability of C
code in your example will not be affected because a return of zero
always means successful termination and the C library is obliged to
translate this to whatever code that the system uses for successful
termination. Thus if for the underlying system 10 indicates successful
termination and you return zero, the C library will actually return 10.
It will do the same for a return of EXIT_SUCCESS too. A recompile for
each platform will ensure correct behaviour.

Right - just to clear up a minor point, is 0 defined by the standard
to be success (as well as EXIT_SUCCESS)?

Nick

[Richard Bos]

Re: Return value of main

polas <nick@helpforce .comwrote:

Right - just to clear up a minor point, is 0 defined by the standard
to be success (as well as EXIT_SUCCESS)?

Yes. (As an aside, it's not _guaranteed_ that 0 and EXIT_SUCCESS are the
same kind of success, but in practice, I don't think there are many
ssytems which have more than one kind anyway.)

Richard

[Jean-Marc Bourguet]

Re: Return value of main

rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) writes:

polas <nick@helpforce .comwrote:
>

Right - just to clear up a minor point, is 0 defined by the standard
to be success (as well as EXIT_SUCCESS)?

>
Yes. (As an aside, it's not _guaranteed_ that 0 and EXIT_SUCCESS are the
same kind of success, but in practice, I don't think there are many
ssytems which have more than one kind anyway.)

IIRC, VMS has several kinds of success: every even result is a failure and
every odd one a success; the runtime does something particular in the case
of 0 so that it has its standard behaviour instead of the VMS one).

Yours,

--
Jean-Marc

[Kenneth Brody]

Re: Return value of main

Richard Bos wrote:

>
polas <nick@helpforce .comwrote:

[...]

The Standard requires three values to return a definite status to the
environment: 0 and EXIT_SUCCESS signal success, EXIT_FAILURE signals
failure. EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE are macros #defined in
<stdlib.h>; what their actual values are is not defined by the Standard,
and may vary from implementation to implementation. Of course it is
highly common for EXIT_SUCCESS to be 0, and EXIT_FAILURE is often 1, but
neither of those is guaranteed.

Well, it is guaranteed that EXIT_FAILURE cannot be defined as zero.

For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

>
It does; hence the existence of EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE, which can
be adapted to the OS' needs.

Note that exit(0) will still signal "success", even in this case.

--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | #include |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | <std_disclaimer .h|
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:ThisIsA SpamTrap@gmail. com>

[Martin Ambuhl]

Re: Return value of main

polas wrote:

Good afternoon all,
>
I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else? In addition, if there has been some
failure, do people tend to return another value (such as -1?)

Without including <stdlib.h>, there is only one portable value, 0, which
indicates successful completion.

If you include <stdlib.h>, you have available the values EXIT_SUCCESS
and EXIT_FAILURE.

Is there any standard for operating systems to handle the C return
value in a particular way (I know some ignore it and some do not) ?
For instance, if OS A regards return value 0 as successes and OS B
regards return value 0 as failure then surely this would affect the
portability of the C code?

There were C implementations that when the C program returned 0 would
indicate to the operating system that the program had failed. Such
implementations , as far as I know, are no longer used and obsolete. If
you want to indicate successful completion, return 0 or EXIT_SUCCESS.
If you want to portably indicate failure, return EXIT_FAILURE. Your
implementation and operating system might define meanings for other
values, but they are not portable or defined by the C language.

[pete]

Re: Return value of main

Kenneth Brody wrote:

Well, it is guaranteed that EXIT_FAILURE cannot be defined as zero.

That's not guaranteed.

Some systems don't make use of the return value of main,
and on systems that don't,
there is no reason to have any meaning at all
encoded into the values that main can return.

--
pete

[santosh]

Re: Return value of main

user923005 wrote:

On Mar 10, 6:52 am, santosh <santosh....@gm ail.comwrote:

>polas wrote:

Good afternoon all,

>>

I appreciate that the standard requires that main should return an
integer. What I was wondering though is there any accepted
standardisation on exactly what value to return - do people tend to
return 0 or 1 or anything else? In addition, if there has been some
failure, do people tend to return another value (such as -1?)

>>
>The only standard values for these are 0, EXIT_SUCCESS and
>EXIT_FAILURE . Zero is the same as EXIT_SUCCESS. For using any other
>values (like 1, -1 etc.) you'll have to seek the guarantees of
>standards beyond ISO C.

<snip>

So we can conclude that return 0 or return EXIT_SUCCESS will return
successful status and that return EXIT_FAILURE will return
unsuccessful status and that any other value must be implementation
defined.

That's what I believe I said too.