Possible to have virtual constructor

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • rameshgcecs
    New Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 1
    #1

    Possible to have virtual constructor

    Why It Is Not Possible To Have A Virtual Constructor In C++?
    Tags: None
    • Peterwkc
      New Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 55
      #2
      The purpose of constructor is explicit initialize a raw memory to a valid value.

      That's why u can't have virtual destructor.

        Comment

        • sicarie
          Recognized Expert Specialist
          • Nov 2006
          • 4677
          #3
          As this is an extremely common homework problem, let me ask you: why do you think it is not possible?

          2nd question: If it were possible, would it be useful?

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...