why void and why not void as a return type

[Ajit Bhoravkar]

As a method returns a int value we have return type as a int and if method returns nothing we use return type as a void.
If the method is not returning anything then why should we use void. I know that without giving the return type to a method it will give an error. But my question is why void if a method return nothing.
eg:
void abc()
{
stat1;
....;
}
why not
abc()
{
stat1;
....;
}

[Subin Ninan]

abc()
{
 ....
}

is a constructor. It is required to specify return type as void if method doesn't return value.

[Plater]

Technically, at the end of a void function you could explicitly call a
return;
But it is implicitly understood to behave that way.