using reflection to invoke static methods of the class

[puzzlecracker]

Say, I have classname string, static method string, parameters list
(which is char[]). Can I use reflection to invoke the method?

[Peter Duniho]

Re: using reflection to invoke static methods of the class

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:33:56 -0700, puzzlecracker <ironsel2000@gm ail.com>
wrote:

Say, I have classname string, static method string, parameters list
(which is char[]). Can I use reflection to invoke the method?

Yes.

[sternr]

Re: using reflection to invoke static methods of the class

On Oct 16, 10:33 pm, puzzlecracker <ironsel2...@gm ail.comwrote:

Say, I have classname string, static  method string, parameters list
(which is char[]). Can I use reflection to invoke the method?

Yes.
Using Type.GetType("Y OUR-TYPE").InvokeMe mber
The second parameter is BindingFlag, specify BindingFlags.St atic for
invocation of static methods.

--sternr

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?=]

Re: using reflection to invoke static methods of the class

puzzlecracker wrote:

Say, I have classname string, static method string, parameters list
(which is char[]). Can I use reflection to invoke the method?

Yes.

Example:

using System;
using System.Reflecti on;

namespace E
{
public class Program
{
public static void Test(char[] ca)
{
foreach(char c in ca)
{
Console.Write(c );
}
Console.WriteLi ne();
}
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
typeof(Program) .InvokeMember(" Test",
BindingFlags.De claredOnly | BindingFlags.Pu blic | BindingFlags.St atic |
BindingFlags.In vokeMethod, null, null, new object[] { new char[] { 'H',
'e', 'l', 'l', 'o' }});
Console.ReadKey ();
}
}
}

Arne

[Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]]

Re: using reflection to invoke static methods of the class

puzzlecracker wrote:

Say, I have classname string, static method string, parameters list
(which is char[]). Can I use reflection to invoke the method?

Are you referring to a constructor (method name == class name)? Yes you can
use reflection, no most of the code suggested to you isn't going to work
exactly the same for constructor calls.