.NET 3.5 SP1 Security Change

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP]
    #1

    .NET 3.5 SP1 Security Change

    How do you guys feel about this change to security? Shared drives now run
    with full trust. I'm I the only one thinking that this is a terrible idea?
    .NET Security Blog
    http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2008/05/12/fulltrust-on-the-localintranet.aspx

    Don't bother posting a comment to the blog, it won't show up.

    --

    Regards,
    Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]

    [Shameless Author plug]
    Download OWC Black Book, 2nd Edition
    Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc $15.00
    Need a free copy of VSTS 2008 w/ MSDN Premium?
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/alvin/Default.aspx

    -------------------------------------------------------


    Tags: None
    • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?=
      #2
      Re: .NET 3.5 SP1 Security Change

      Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP] wrote:
      How do you guys feel about this change to security? Shared drives now
      run with full trust. I'm I the only one thinking that this is a terrible
      idea?
      .NET Security Blog
      http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2008/05/12/fulltrust-on-the-localintranet.aspx

      Don't bother posting a comment to the blog, it won't show up.
      It is:
      prio(easy) prio(secure)

      I guess MS got too many complaints.

      Arne

        Comment

        • Pavel Minaev
          #3
          Re: .NET 3.5 SP1 Security Change

          On Jul 15, 2:50 am, "Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP]" <vapor dan using hot
          male spam filterwrote:
          How do you guys feel about this change to security? Shared drives now run
          with full trust. I'm I the only one thinking that this is a terrible idea?http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archiv...ust-on-the-loc...
          Don't bother posting a comment to the blog, it won't show up.
          Didn't they just change things so that managed applications have the
          same permissions as native applications?

          If so, I don't really see a problem.

            Comment

            • Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP]
              #4
              Re: .NET 3.5 SP1 Security Change

              Managed code is supposed to overcome the limitations of unmanaged code else
              why are we here? It doesn't justify it if it was doable in native. Anyway,
              it doesn't seem this is a big problem so I'll keep quiet about this - not
              that I want to.

              --

              Regards,
              Alvin Bruney [MVP ASP.NET]

              [Shameless Author plug]
              Download OWC Black Book, 2nd Edition
              Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc $15.00
              Need a free copy of VSTS 2008 w/ MSDN Premium?
              http://msmvps.com/blogs/alvin/Default.aspx

              -------------------------------------------------------


              "Pavel Minaev" <int19h@gmail.c omwrote in message
              news:14e5616f-5ca2-4287-9563-fa3d49b31f15@m4 5g2000hsb.googl egroups.com...
              On Jul 15, 2:50 am, "Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP]" <vapor dan using hot
              male spam filterwrote:
              >How do you guys feel about this change to security? Shared drives now run
              >with full trust. I'm I the only one thinking that this is a terrible
              >idea?http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archiv...ust-on-the-loc...
              >Don't bother posting a comment to the blog, it won't show up.
              >
              Didn't they just change things so that managed applications have the
              same permissions as native applications?
              >
              If so, I don't really see a problem.

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...