'protected internal' keyword combination

[=?Utf-8?B?am1lbGtlcnNvbg==?=]

Does the 'protected internal' keyword combination effectively equate to
'private'?

[Jeroen Mostert]

Re: 'protected internal' keyword combination

jmelkerson wrote:

Does the 'protected internal' keyword combination effectively equate to
'private'?

Not at all, it means "protected or internal". In other words, either derived
classes or classes in the same assembly can access the member (so it's more
liberal than either "protected" or "internal") .

--
J.

[Peter Duniho]

Re: 'protected internal' keyword combination

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:35:04 -0700, jmelkerson
<jmelkerson@dis cussions.micros oft.comwrote:

Does the 'protected internal' keyword combination effectively equate to
'private'?

No.

[=?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?=]

Re: 'protected internal' keyword combination

jmelkerson wrote:

Does the 'protected internal' keyword combination effectively equate to
'private'?

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173121.aspx

Arne