About boxing

[Tony Johansson]

Hello!

int i = 5;
if I write this statement
Console.Writeln ("Test of i = {0}", i);
then I assume that will i be boxed
Is that correct understood of me?

//Tony

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: About boxing

Tony Johansson <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

int i = 5;
if I write this statement
Console.Writeln ("Test of i = {0}", i);
then I assume that will i be boxed
Is that correct understood of me?

Yes.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
Web site: http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
C# in Depth: http://csharpindepth.com

[Peter Duniho]

Re: About boxing

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0700, Tony Johansson
<johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

Hello!

Hi!

int i = 5;
if I write this statement
Console.Writeln ("Test of i = {0}", i);
then I assume that will i be boxed
Is that correct understood of me?

Yes. You can avoid the boxing penalty by making the needed string
conversion happen earlier. Either just "concatenat e" the variable i to
the "Test of i = " string (the compiler will perform the type conversion)
or call i.ToString() and pass that as your argument instead of i.

That said, i/o is slow. It's unlikely that the cost of boxing an argument
to the WriteLine() method would be a problem. IMHO, the code you posted
is perfectly fine (just fix the name of the method so it compiles :) ).

Pete

[Tony Johansson]

Re: About boxing

Hello!

The reason for i to be boxed is because the second parameter of Writeln is
received as an object.
Is this also correct understodd of me?

//Tony



"Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPeAdM@nn owslpianmk.coms krev i meddelandet
news:op.ub6vv6c f8jd0ej@petes-computer.local. ..
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0700, Tony Johansson
<johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

Hello!

Hi!

int i = 5;
if I write this statement
Console.Writeln ("Test of i = {0}", i);
then I assume that will i be boxed
Is that correct understood of me?

Yes. You can avoid the boxing penalty by making the needed string
conversion happen earlier. Either just "concatenat e" the variable i to
the "Test of i = " string (the compiler will perform the type conversion)
or call i.ToString() and pass that as your argument instead of i.

That said, i/o is slow. It's unlikely that the cost of boxing an argument
to the WriteLine() method would be a problem. IMHO, the code you posted
is perfectly fine (just fix the name of the method so it compiles :) ).

Pete

[Peter Duniho]

Re: About boxing

On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:22:33 -0700, Tony Johansson
<johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

The reason for i to be boxed is because the second parameter of Writeln
is
received as an object.

It's "WriteLine" . But yes, for the overload that applies to the syntax
you've used, that's exactly right. There's not a WriteLine(Strin g, Int32)
overload, so the one where i can be boxed as an object and passed that way
winds up being used.

Pete

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: About boxing

Tony Johansson <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

The reason for i to be boxed is because the second parameter of Writeln is
received as an object.
Is this also correct understodd of me?

Yup.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
Web site: http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
C# in Depth: http://csharpindepth.com

[Cor Ligthert[MVP]]

Re: About boxing

Tony,

In my idea is this not boxing.

For me is Boxing is putting an object in an extra object like a box.

However here is behind the scene probably the already overload function
ToString() method from system.values used.

Be aware that beside of the thoughts of some C++ programmers who were busy
on 8088 (or even 16 bits ones) the effect from boxing is today very low on
your performance as it is not about things as pixel processing or more like
that.

Cor


Console.Writeln K(
"Tony Johansson" <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com schreef in bericht
news:xuh1k.7981 $R_4.6580@newsb .telia.net...

Hello!
>
int i = 5;
if I write this statement
Console.Writeln ("Test of i = {0}", i);
then I assume that will i be boxed
Is that correct understood of me?
>
//Tony
>

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: About boxing

On Jun 4, 5:10 am, "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <notmyfirstn... @planet.nl>
wrote:

In my idea is this not boxing.

Consult the generated IL and you'll find it certainly is.

For me is Boxing is putting an object in an extra object like a box.

And that's what happens when you call Console.WriteLi ne(String,
Object).

If there were an overload for WriteLine which took (String,int) then
it wouldn't be boxed at that point (but possibly later). In this case,
however, the value of i is boxed as part of the act of making the call
to Console.WriteLi ne.

Be aware that beside of the thoughts of some C++ programmers who were busy
on 8088 (or even 16 bits ones) the effect from boxing is today very low on
your performance as it is not about things as pixel processing or more like
that.

Agreed.

Jon