msdn doc question
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=Tags: None -
Mark Rae [MVP]
Re: msdn doc question
"rodchar" <rodchar@discus sions.microsoft .comwrote in message
news:E52F304D-5FE2-4C1B-B3EB-84C0F6A4B312@mi crosoft.com...
It means exactly what it says.
The fact that you added a bound field to the header doesn't mean that the
header is databound - it must meas that the bound field you added to the
header is databound...
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
-
=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=
Re: msdn doc question
thanks for the help,
rod.
"Mark Rae [MVP]" wrote:
"rodchar" <rodchar@discus sions.microsoft .comwrote in message
news:E52F304D-5FE2-4C1B-B3EB-84C0F6A4B312@mi crosoft.com...
>>
It means exactly what it says.
>
The fact that you added a bound field to the header doesn't mean that the
header is databound - it must meas that the bound field you added to the
header is databound...
>
>
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
>
>Comment
Comment