VS2005 validator <> W3c validator ?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • teo

    VS2005 validator <> W3c validator ?

    hallo

    I'm using vs2005
    I set the validator to 'Xhtml transitional 1.0'
    I notice that the validator fails
    It doesn't detect some errors and it considers other ones as error
    but they are not

    I'm ASSUMING that what w3c validator says is RIGHT

    - - - - - - - - - -

    in example :

    vs2005 validator says nothing about id="5hallo"
    and
    w3c says the digit 5 at the beginning is not allowed

    also

    vs2005 says align="justify" is not allowed
    and
    w3c accepts it

    also

    vs2005 says nothing about the char < in the text
    and
    w3c says I have to use the symbolic equivalent

    - - - - - - - - - -

    Is the vs2005 validator wrong?

    Is it possible to fine tune its rules?

    If I have to manually edit some schema file,
    I ask you if you have a schema file perfectly acting as the w3c acts
    so I can download and replace the current vs2005 schema file

    - - - - - - - - - -

    Another thing (partially related)
    on creating an aspx page, the Viewstate field is called id="__
    but the w3c says that __ is not acceptable

    How is it possible?
    How to have the aspx page 'Xhtml 10 transitional' valid since its creation?
Working...