On Feb 23, 12:39 pm, Michael Nemtsev [MVP] <nemt...@msn.co mwrote:
Hello Logician,
>
LI would appreciate any views held by developers in this NG of the
Lworth of Visual Studio 2008 Professional and the same software but
Lthe Standard version.
>
see the product comparisionhttp ://msdn2.microsoft .com/de-de/vs2008/products/bb980920(en-us).aspx
>
LAlso, does anyone have any concept of the worth of 3.0 over 3.5 and
Lif 3.5 will have incompatibiliti es with 3.0, ie would code written
Lunder 3.0 fail in 3.5?
>
yep, it fails. u need .net 3.5 to compile and run .net 3.5 projects
>
.NET is compatible from the top to the bottom
>
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog:http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
>
LI would appreciate any views held by developers in this NG of the
Lworth of Visual Studio 2008 Professional and the same software but
Lthe Standard version.
>
see the product comparisionhttp ://msdn2.microsoft .com/de-de/vs2008/products/bb980920(en-us).aspx
>
LAlso, does anyone have any concept of the worth of 3.0 over 3.5 and
Lif 3.5 will have incompatibiliti es with 3.0, ie would code written
Lunder 3.0 fail in 3.5?
>
yep, it fails. u need .net 3.5 to compile and run .net 3.5 projects
>
.NET is compatible from the top to the bottom
>
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog:http://spaces.live.com/laflour
>
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
Mobile later.
Leave a comment: