Hi All,
I have a database which uses a lot of linked tables from the front-end
to both Access and Oracle backend tables.
I was just doing fine for months, until I created a new set of forms
and a few new tables.
Now, whenever I issue out my front end, it starts bloating out and
grows like crazy. My normal 7MB file is currently, with one user, a
125MB file!
I've tested, and it's every time I edit in a window that merges Access
and Oracle data together. And they edit a record from that query.
Problem is, it looks just like the other kind of queries I've always
done. There's a few calculated fields in the database.
(concatenating a firstname/lastname together from Oracle into a "full
name". And, a sorting field created by a math equation using the -1
from an Access yes/no field. That sort of thing.) But, these are all
things I've done in the past.
Any hints or helps on what might be going on? (Compacting fixes it.)
My Access backend file with the actual data stays nice and slim. So,
I assume there's some sort of caching going on to deal with locks or
"dynasets" or queries or something.
TIA,
Jon
I have a database which uses a lot of linked tables from the front-end
to both Access and Oracle backend tables.
I was just doing fine for months, until I created a new set of forms
and a few new tables.
Now, whenever I issue out my front end, it starts bloating out and
grows like crazy. My normal 7MB file is currently, with one user, a
125MB file!
I've tested, and it's every time I edit in a window that merges Access
and Oracle data together. And they edit a record from that query.
Problem is, it looks just like the other kind of queries I've always
done. There's a few calculated fields in the database.
(concatenating a firstname/lastname together from Oracle into a "full
name". And, a sorting field created by a math equation using the -1
from an Access yes/no field. That sort of thing.) But, these are all
things I've done in the past.
Any hints or helps on what might be going on? (Compacting fixes it.)
My Access backend file with the actual data stays nice and slim. So,
I assume there's some sort of caching going on to deal with locks or
"dynasets" or queries or something.
TIA,
Jon
Comment